EU AI Act

EU AI Act compliance for LLM deployments

The EU AI Act entered into force in August 2024. GPAI model obligations under Article 53 have been enforceable since August 2025. High-risk AI system requirements under Articles 9 and 15 apply to any system that influences decisions with significant impact on people. If your firm deploys LLMs in any such context, you have obligations now.

What applies to your LLM deployments

The EU AI Act creates a risk-tiered framework. Most enterprise LLM deployments in fintech fall into one of two categories:

High-risk systems (Annex III)

AI systems used in credit scoring, employment decisions, access to essential services, or law enforcement contexts. Articles 9 and 15 apply in full.

Full documentation, testing, and risk management required.

GPAI models (Article 53)

General-purpose models (GPT-4, Claude, Llama 3 family, etc.) used in EU-facing deployments. Technical documentation and transparency obligations apply.

Documentation and summary requirements enforceable since Aug 2025.

Note: LLMSec is not a legal advisory service. This page summarizes our understanding of the AI Act's technical requirements. Consult qualified EU legal counsel for your specific compliance obligations.

LLMSec coverage by Article

Article 9 — Risk Management

Requirement: Establish, implement, document, and maintain a risk management system. Includes testing for foreseeable misuse, known and foreseeable risks.

LLMSec probes covering this article

Jailbreak and adversarial prompt testingPrompt injection (direct and indirect)Toxicity and harmful output detectionMulti-turn escalation testing

Article 10 — Data Governance

Requirement: Training, validation, and testing data must be free from errors and complete. Models must be tested on data representative of intended use.

LLMSec probes covering this article

Training data extraction probesPII leakage detectionMemorization testing

Article 15 — Robustness, Accuracy, Cybersecurity

Requirement: High-risk AI systems must achieve appropriate levels of accuracy, robustness, and cybersecurity. Must be resilient against attempts by third parties to manipulate outputs.

LLMSec probes covering this article

Adversarial suffix injectionBase64 / encoding bypass testingSystem prompt override attemptsReliability and refusal consistency

Article 53 — GPAI Model Obligations

Requirement: Providers of general-purpose AI models must maintain technical documentation, comply with copyright law, and publish a summary of training data used.

LLMSec probes covering this article

Technical documentation of scan methodologyAudit trail with Ed25519 signingScan fingerprint for reproducibility

The risk tier that matters most for fintech

Annex III, point 5(b) of the EU AI Act lists "AI systems intended to be used for creditworthiness assessment or credit scoring" as high-risk. If your LLM is used in any workflow that feeds into credit decisions — even as an assistant to a human analyst — you are likely in high-risk territory.

Article 9 requires that high-risk AI systems be subject to a formal risk management process that includes "testing procedures to address situations that may occur in reality." This is exactly what LLMSec's probe library provides — systematic, documented testing that produces evidence for your technical documentation file.

Article 15 requires that high-risk systems be "resilient as regards attempts by unauthorized third parties to alter their use, outputs or performance." LLMSec's adversarial probe suite — jailbreaking, prompt injection, encoding bypass — tests exactly this resilience.

Why on-premise scanning matters for EU AI Act

EU AI Act compliance requires that you maintain technical documentation of your AI systems. This documentation must include test results and evidence of risk management. If you use a cloud-hosted LLM safety scanner, your test data — including potentially sensitive system prompts and model outputs — leaves your network.

With LLMSec, all scan data stays inside your infrastructure. Your technical documentation is generated and stored locally. You never expose system prompts, model outputs, or findings to any third party — including us. This is the structural prerequisite for any regulated EU deployment.

How is accuracy measured?EU AI Act Article 15 requires transparent evaluation methodology for high-risk systems. Every LLMSec judge's precision, recall, F1, and false-negative rate is published — including weaknesses — on the calibration & methodology page.

See an EU AI Act-mapped report

Request a sample report with findings mapped to Articles 9 and 15, or book a demo to see a live scan.